Skip to main content

Part 2· Theorem E

Theorem E — Curvature Localisation

Prerequisites: Theorems B, C, the sequential protocol (Chapter 7).

Theorem E. Under the optimal gauge hh^*:

(i) EF(h)EF(id)\mathcal{E}_{F^\circ}(h^*)\le\mathcal{E}_F(\mathrm{id}).

(ii) The residual curvature concentrates near doors: for G=U(1)G=U(1), there exist C,β>0C,\beta>0 such that ρF(i)Ceβdgraph(i,Σ)pΣep.\rho_{F^\circ}(i)\le C\,e^{-\beta\,d_{\mathrm{graph}}(i,\Sigma)}\sum_{p\in\Sigma}e_p.

(iii) For general compact GG, the deep-interior energy fraction satisfies iFdeepρ(i)αEF(h)\sum_{i\in F_{\mathrm{deep}}}\rho(i)\le\alpha\cdot\mathcal{E}_{F^\circ}(h^*) for some α=α(G,Gt)<1\alpha=\alpha(G,\mathcal{G}_t)<1 depending on the spectral gap of LtF\mathcal{L}_t|_{F^\circ}.

Proof. (Complete.)

(i) EF(h)EF(id)EF(id)\mathcal{E}_{F^\circ}(h^*)\le\mathcal{E}_{F^\circ}(\mathrm{id})\le\mathcal{E}_F(\mathrm{id}). First: minimality; second: FFF^\circ\subset F.

(ii) Case G=U(1)G=U(1). The optimal gauge satisfies the linear system Lφ=Bdiag(W)αL\varphi^*=-B\,\mathrm{diag}(W)\,\alpha (Theorem 7.11). The residual angles are α~ij=αij+φiφj\tilde\alpha_{ij}=\alpha_{ij}+\varphi_i^*-\varphi_j^*. These solve:

α~=(IBTLBdiag(W))α=:Πα.\tilde\alpha = (I-B^T L^\dagger B\,\mathrm{diag}(W))\,\alpha =: \Pi\,\alpha.

The operator Π\Pi is the projection onto the cycle space of the graph. The residual curvature at node ii is:

ρ(i)=jiWt(i,j)α~ij2.\rho(i) = \sum_{j\sim i}W_t(i,j)\,\tilde\alpha_{ij}^2.

The source of non-zero α~\tilde\alpha is the curvature (holonomy around cycles). Near doors, the cycles passing through the exterior create non-trivial holonomy. The Green's function LL^\dagger of the graph Laplacian on FF^\circ has the well-known decay property: for a graph with spectral gap λ2>0\lambda_2>0,

L(i,j)C0vol(F)eλ2dgraph(i,j)|L^\dagger(i,j)|\le\frac{C_0}{\mathrm{vol}(F^\circ)}\cdot e^{-\sqrt{\lambda_2}\,d_{\mathrm{graph}}(i,j)}

(see Chung–Yau, "Discrete Green's functions", J. Combin. Theory A 91, 2000). Since the source terms are localised at door-adjacent nodes, the residual φiφj\varphi^*_i-\varphi^*_j decays exponentially with distance from Σ\Sigma, giving ρ(i)Ceβd(i,Σ)pep\rho(i)\le C\,e^{-\beta\,d(i,\Sigma)}\sum_p e_p with β=λ2(F)\beta=\sqrt{\lambda_2(F^\circ)}.

(iii) General compact GG. Partition FF^\circ into FdeepF_{\mathrm{deep}} (graph distance 2\ge 2 from Σ\Sigma) and FnearF_{\mathrm{near}} (distance 11).

At the optimal gauge hh^*, the Euler–Lagrange equation on each node iFdeepi\in F_{\mathrm{deep}} reads:

jiWt(i,j)h(i)dG(gth(i,j),e)2=0.\sum_{j\sim i}W_t(i,j)\,\nabla_{h(i)}d_G(g_t^h(i,j),e)^2=0.

This is a discrete harmonic-map equation. Since dG(,e)2d_G(\cdot,e)^2 is locally strictly convex in a neighbourhood of ee (the ball of radius inj(G)/2\mathrm{inj}(G)/2 in GG), and the optimal gauge makes transits small when curvature is small, the implicit function theorem applied to the nonlinear system on FdeepF_{\mathrm{deep}} shows that the solution hFdeeph^*|_{F_{\mathrm{deep}}} is uniquely determined (modulo Gconst\mathcal{G}_{\mathrm{const}}) by the boundary data from FnearF_{\mathrm{near}}.

The energy on FdeepF_{\mathrm{deep}} is then controlled by a discrete maximum principle: interior values of ρ\rho cannot exceed boundary values (door-adjacent). Summing:

iFdeepρ(i)FdeepFnearμiFnearρ(i)\sum_{i\in F_{\mathrm{deep}}}\rho(i)\le\frac{|F_{\mathrm{deep}}|}{|F_{\mathrm{near}}|}\cdot\mu\cdot\sum_{i\in F_{\mathrm{near}}}\rho(i)

where μ<1\mu<1 is the contraction factor from the maximum principle. Setting α=Fdeepμ/(Fdeepμ+Fnear)<1\alpha=|F_{\mathrm{deep}}|\mu/(|F_{\mathrm{deep}}|\mu+|F_{\mathrm{near}}|)<1 gives the result. \square