Skip to main content

Research

Ontology Neural Networks

A learning architecture whose latent state carries the explicit type structure of a target ontology. Its original higher-order/cohomological thesis was audited to a scoped No-Go boundary; what survives is a modest direction-channel signal, a standard delay-margin certificate, and the audit methodology itself.

updated 554 words2 min read

An Ontology Neural Network (ONN) is a neural model whose internal state is not a flat vector but a typed object carrying the structure of a target ontology: inference is a constraint-projection onto a topology-aware manifold. The companion ORTSF (Ontological Real-Time Semantic Fabric) framework turns the output of that inference into a closed-loop controller.

The programme's organising bet was that the topology of a representation space is itself a control-theoretic object — that the same higher-order/cohomological invariants which classify learned features would also certify the loop closed around them. That bet was put under a formal audit, and it did not survive in its strong form.

What survived the audit

  • A modest, non-higher-order positive. One signal held up under the audit: a small direction-channel effect (a Q-weak improvement of roughly +0.11–0.12 AUROC). It does not come from higher-order structure — it is the honest positive result of the programme.
  • A standard delay-margin certificate. The ORTSF control result reduces to a textbook delay margin (Δtmax=φPM/ωc\Delta t_{\max} = \varphi_{\mathrm{PM}}/\omega_c) plus a sufficient small-gain condition — decoupled from the ontology's cohomology. See the certificate.
  • The audit methodology. The pre-registered contract, the consistent/complete/finite scene conditions, and the falsification discipline that turned an appealing thesis into a checkable boundary.

Earlier manuscripts (superseded framing)

These 2025 drafts state the original optimistic framing. Their headline empirical numbers (e.g. "99.75 % of predicted optimality", a constructive-Lyapunov "60-year gap" closure) are not reproducible from the current research source and are superseded by the audit above; they are retained as manuscripts of record with a status banner on each page.

Papers on this track

The working implementation — benchmarks against transformer baselines, ablation studies, and the ORTSF gate library — is maintained privately and results are surfaced here as they are cleaned for public reading.