Skip to main content

Research

Ontology Neural Networks

A learning architecture whose latent state carries explicit ontology structure. Its strong higher-order thesis was audited to a scoped No-Go boundary; a modest direction-channel signal, a scalar delayed-recurrence stability result, and the audit method survive, while coupled system-level certification does not.

updated 578 words2 min read

An Ontology Neural Network (ONN) is a neural model whose internal state is not a flat vector but a typed object carrying the structure of a target ontology: inference is a constraint-projection onto a topology-aware manifold. The companion ORTSF (Ontological Real-Time Semantic Fabric) framework turns the output of that inference into a closed-loop controller.

The programme's organising bet was that the topology of a representation space is itself a control-theoretic object — that the same higher-order/cohomological invariants which classify learned features would also certify the loop closed around them. That bet was put under a formal audit, and it did not survive in its strong form.

What survived the audit

  • A modest, non-higher-order positive. One signal held up under the audit: a small direction-channel effect (a Q-weak improvement of roughly +0.11–0.12 AUROC). It does not come from higher-order structure — it is the honest positive result of the programme.
  • A scoped scalar control result. For the implemented recurrence e[t+1]=ρe[t]Kce[td]e[t+1] = \rho e[t] - K_c e[t-d] in one HH^\perp mode, ρ+Kc<1\rho + |K_c| < 1 is sufficient for Schur stability for every integer delay d1d \geq 1decoupled from the ontology's cohomology. Coupled multimode dynamics, the BB-operator bound, and PD-gain mapping remain open. See the certificate.
  • The audit methodology. The pre-registered contract, the consistent/complete/finite scene conditions, and the falsification discipline that turned an appealing thesis into a checkable boundary.

Earlier manuscripts (superseded framing)

These 2025 drafts state the original optimistic framing. Their headline empirical numbers (e.g. "99.75 % of predicted optimality", a constructive-Lyapunov "60-year gap" closure) are not reproducible from the current research source and are superseded by the audit above; they are retained as manuscripts of record with a status banner on each page.

Papers on this track

The archived working implementation included benchmarks against transformer baselines, ablation studies, and the ORTSF gate library. Audited results that survived are preserved here; active development now belongs to ULR.