Skip to main content

Notes

SCC Canonical Spec — Part 2: Axiomatic Groups & Proto-Cohesion

16 equations extracted from this document. Each equation pairs with the prose paragraph that immediately precedes it in the source — clicking the title above opens the full document.

Open source document →

  1. #1

    A1'. Conditional Extensivity (Self-Regulation). For all and all ,

    Clt(u)(x)u(x)whenever u(x)c and (Ptu)(x)u(x)\mathrm{Cl}_t(u)(x) \geq u(x) \quad \text{whenever } u(x) \leq c^* \text{ and } (P_t u)(x) \geq u(x)
  2. #2

    A2. Monotonicity. For all ,

    uv    Clt(u)Clt(v)u \leq v \implies \mathrm{Cl}_t(u) \leq \mathrm{Cl}_t(v)
  3. #3

    A3. Stabilization Tendency (Contraction). Iterated application of satisfies the Cauchy condition:

    Clt(n+1)(u)Clt(n)(u)0as n\|\mathrm{Cl}_t^{(n+1)}(u) - \mathrm{Cl}_t^{(n)}(u)\| \to 0 \quad \text{as } n \to \infty
  4. #4

    B1. Nonnegativity. For all ,

    Nt(x,y)0.\mathbf{N}_t(x,y) \geq 0.
  5. #5

    B2. Symmetry. In the minimal (undirected) case,

    Nt(x,y)=Nt(y,x).\mathbf{N}_t(x,y) = \mathbf{N}_t(y,x).
  6. #6

    C4. Symmetry. For all ,

    Ct(x,y)=Ct(y,x).\mathbf{C}_t(x,y) = \mathbf{C}_t(y,x).
  7. #7

    Provisional Realization. The resolvent form

    Ct=(IαWsym)1\mathbf{C}_t = (I - \alpha\, W_{\mathrm{sym}})^{-1}
  8. #8

    E1. Sub-Stochasticity. For each ,

    yXsMts(x,y)1.\sum_{y \in X_s} \mathbf{M}_{t \to s}(x,y) \leq 1.
  9. #9

    E3. Core Inheritance (Solution Constraint). The transport kernel should preferentially preserve the cohesive core. That is, for sites in , the inherited cohesion at the receiving sites should remain high:

    yXsMts(x,y)us(y)δfor some δ>0\sum_{y \in X_s} \mathbf{M}_{t \to s}(x,y)\, u_s(y) \geq \delta \quad \text{for some } \delta > 0
  10. #10

    Binding. The predicate assesses how closely the cohesion field at time approximates self-support under closure:

    Bindt(ut)=1utClt(ut)2n\mathsf{Bind}_t(u_t) = 1 - \frac{\|u_t - \mathrm{Cl}_t(u_t)\|_2}{\sqrt{n}}
  11. #11

    Separation. The predicate assesses the degree to which the cohesion field is structurally distinguished from its exterior, weighted by cohesion:

    Sept(ut)=xXtut(x)Dt(x;1ut)xXtut(x)\mathsf{Sep}_t(u_t) = \frac{\sum_{x \in X_t} u_t(x)\, \mathbf{D}_t(x;\, 1-u_t)}{\sum_{x \in X_t} u_t(x)}
  12. #12

    Inside-Structure. The predicate assesses the morphological articulation of the cohesion field:

    Insidet(ut)=Qmorph(ut)\mathsf{Inside}_t(u_t) = \mathcal{Q}_{\mathrm{morph}}(u_t)
  13. #13

    where the morphological quality measure is defined as

    Qmorph(ut)=max(ut)c1cArtic(ut)\mathcal{Q}_{\mathrm{morph}}(u_t) = \frac{\ell_{\max}(u_t) - c}{1 - c} \cdot \mathrm{Artic}(u_t)
  14. #14

    Persistence. The predicate assesses the degree to which the cohesive organization is structurally inherited across time throughout the window :

    PersistW(u)=mint<sWxCoretyCoresMts(x,y)us(y)ρpersist\mathsf{Persist}_W(\mathbf{u}) = \min_{t < s \in W} \frac{\sum_{x \in \mathrm{Core}_t} \sum_{y \in \mathrm{Core}_s} \mathbf{M}_{t \to s}(x,y)\, u_s(y)}{\rho_{\mathrm{persist}}}
  15. #15

    Proto-cohesion is reported as a diagnostic vector :

    d=(Bindt, Sept, Insidet, PersistW)\mathbf{d} = \Big(\mathsf{Bind}_t,\ \mathsf{Sep}_t,\ \mathsf{Inside}_t,\ \mathsf{Persist}_W\Big)
  16. #16

    Boolean recovery. The Boolean proto-cohesion predicate is recoverable by thresholding each component:

    ProtoCohWsoft(u)    Bindtεcl    Septδsep    Insidetμin    PersistWρpersist\mathsf{ProtoCoh}^{\mathrm{soft}}_W(\mathbf{u}) \iff \mathsf{Bind}_t \geq \varepsilon_{\mathrm{cl}} \;\wedge\; \mathsf{Sep}_t \geq \delta_{\mathrm{sep}} \;\wedge\; \mathsf{Inside}_t \geq \mu_{\mathrm{in}} \;\wedge\; \mathsf{Persist}_W \geq \rho_{\mathrm{persist}}