Skip to main content

Part 0· Status report (historical snapshot)

SCC — Research Status Snapshot (April 2026, W5 Day 1 G0 close, CV-1.5) — HISTORICAL

This is a living page. It documents the state of Soft Cognitive Cohesion — the research thread I am currently most active on — at the level of granularity that lets a collaborator (or future me) pick up where things stand without re-reading a year of notes.

Last updated: 2026-04-27 (W5 Day 1 G0 close).   Canonical version: CV-1.5.   Full specification: see the Canonical Spec note.

What SCC is, in one breath

A mathematical theory of how coherent formations emerge prior to discrete objecthood. The primitive is a soft cohesion field

ut:Xt[0,1]u_t : X_t \to [0, 1]

over a relational support space. Objects are a distinguished limit of the formation space, not its starting point. Four independent energy terms govern closure, separation, boundary, and transport; a diagnostic vector d=(Bind,Sep,Inside,Persist)\mathbf{d} = (\mathrm{Bind}, \mathrm{Sep}, \mathrm{Inside}, \mathrm{Persist}) reads off formation state.

Theorem ledger (CV-1.5)

The 9 SCC hero theorems and their logical dependencies — a curated subset of the 43 Cat A entries. Foundation (T1, T6, T20), phase + stability (T8-Core, T7-Enhanced, T11, T14), W4 capstone (T-PreObj-1), W4-extended capstone (T-V5b-T), W5 Day 1 G0 σ-framework supporting structures (T-σ-Lemma-1/2/3 + T-σ-Theorem-3/4).

✓ Category A — Fully proved (43)

Existence (T1), closure fixed point (T6a/T6b), axiom monotonicity (T-A2), phase transition core (T8-Core), axiom consistency (T20), gradient flow (T14), stability duo (T3 / T6-Stability), enhanced metastability (T7, p=0.037p = 0.037), Γ\Gamma-convergence (T11), four quantum-mechanical results QM1–4, the Predicate–Energy Bridge, Deep Core Dominance 2b, T-Bind-Proj/Full (all τ), Propositions 1.1/1.2 and Theorem 3.1, Persistence Threshold Equation, the W4 Pre-Objective Mechanism cluster (T-PreObj-1, T-PreObj-1G, Lemma 4), the W4-extended Goldstone result (T-V5b-T), and the W5 Day 1 G0 σ-framework supporting structures (T-σ-Lemma-1/2/3

  • T-σ-Theorem-3/4 — irrep decomposition, nodal count, Goldstone–ℓ=1 saturation, closed-form spectrum at uniform on D4D_4 free-BC, leading-order σ at first pitchfork).

◇ Category B — Proved with structural parameter (4)

  • Barrier exponent γeff0.89\gamma_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx 0.89 — empirical fit, branch/path/manifold conditioned.
  • T-Birth-Parametric (general non-D₄ graphs) — supercriticality on D₄-symmetric graphs is Cat A; general graphs remain Cat B.
  • T-d_min-Formula — branch-conditioned regression fit.
  • T-Beyond-Weyl — structured spectral perturbation bound; quantitative 33× factor is config-specific.

◯ Category C — Conditional (5 + 1 new finding)

  • T-Persist-1(d) — exact-threshold preservation under structural condition β>7α\beta > 7\alpha.
  • T-Persist-Full — composition through (d).
  • T-Persist-K-Sep — well-separated regime conditions (WS, SR).
  • T-Persist-K-Weak — weakly-interacting regime conditions (WI, SR, NB-K).
  • T-Persist-K-Unified — parametric (PS, ND, BC′-K, TC-K, SR-Λ), 100% geometric-Lambda agreement on exp46–47.
  • V5b-F (W4-extended new finding) — Partial Goldstone on boundary-modified graphs (NQ-173 carry).

✗ Retracted (5)

  • Theorem 3.3 (general τ\tau form of rˉ0\bar r_0) — falsified.
  • T-Merge (c)(d)(e) — merge path manifold error.
  • K-Saddle Conjecture — pre-v2.1 retraction.

A 5/5 clean sweep on the five single-formation predictions (historical record):

#PredictionOutcome
P1Contraction
P2Independence
P3Enhanced dwell✓ (p = 0.037)
P4Path dependence
P5Sep-before-Inside

Open problems — W4 close (2026-04-24): Critical 3 → 0

F-1 (K=2 vacuity) split-resolved (W4, 2026-04-24). Both layers are Category A: pure E_bd via T-Merge (b) (pre-existing) and full SCC via T-PreObj-1 (i) (W4 new). The dichotomy is dissolved.

The three Critical open problems that gated v2.0 release for nearly a year are all resolved as of W4 close (2026-04-24):

  • OP-0001 · F-1 (K=2 vacuity) — SPLIT-RESOLVED. Two layers, both Cat A: pure Ebd\mathcal{E}_{\mathrm{bd}} portion via T-Merge (b) (canonical, isoperimetric ordering — pre-existing Cat A); full SCC portion via T-PreObj-1 (i) (W4 Cat A, graph-class independent via T-PreObj-1G). Under full SCC parameters the F=1 single-disk minimizer is not a critical point, so the dichotomy "K=1 cheaper vs observed K>1" does not arise.
  • OP-0002 · M-1 (K=1 preference) — LAYER-CLARIFIED. M-1 is the correct mathematical statement (T-Merge (b)), not an open problem. Original framing conflated pure Ebd\mathcal{E}_{\mathrm{bd}} (where M-1 holds) with full SCC (where the comparison is not even framed because F=1 is non-critical). The apparent conflict is resolved by CN15 Static/Dynamic Separation.
  • OP-0003 · MO-1 (Morse inapplicability) — SIDESTEPPED. σ-framework operates on the smooth single-formation manifold Σm\Sigma_m (no corners). Theorem 2 family does not require Morse on ΣMK\Sigma^K_M. Multi-formation extension (stratified Morse, Phase 5) remains genuine open work for W5+.

Net effect: Critical blockers 3 → 0, v2.0 release path unblocked. Resolution path: Option D (premise dissolution) via SCC-intrinsic re-framing — neither Option A (external constraint), B (K-selection), nor C (kinetic reformulation).

CN15 — Static / Dynamic Separation. The conceptual key that allowed F-1 / M-1 to dissolve: the static global minimum on pure E_bd and the dynamic protocol-endpoint observables under full SCC are quantities of different layers; they need not match.

Separately, the exp65 validation failure (2026-04-12) prompted the Type A / Type B classification to be retracted (X-0002).

Remaining open problems (post-W4)

OP-IDSeverityNotes
OP-0005 K-Selection mechanism🟠 HIGHPartially addressed by σ-framework + CN15; full mechanism still open
OP-0004 Boundary precision🟡 MEDIUMtentative (D-0004)
OP-0006 Branch selection theory🟠 HIGHchallenged by exp65
OP-0007 Dynamic topology🟢 LOWfuture extension
W5+ NQ carryNQ-173 (V5b-F), NQ-174 (ζ_*(graph)), NQ-175 (3D extension); σ supporting lemmas merged in W5 Day 1 G0 (CV-1.5); NQ-176..NQ-190 spawned (functoriality, multi-irrep ordering, frustration bound, orbit sharpening, discrete corrections, tie-breaking, higher pitchforks, σ-uniqueness, σ topological invariance); multi-formation σ Phase 5 active (G3, W5 Day 3-4)

Implementation

scc/ package — 175 tests passing

moduleresponsibility
graph.pyGraphState — sparse adjacency, Laplacian, Fiedler, row-normalised PP
params.pyParameterRegistry — constraint validation (acl<4a_{\mathrm{cl}} < 4, spinodal range, βcrit\beta_{\mathrm{crit}})
operators.pyclosure, distinction, aggregation, resolvent — with exact JVP for gradient
energy.pyEcl,Esep,EbdE_{\mathrm{cl}}, E_{\mathrm{sep}}, E_{\mathrm{bd}} with FD-verified gradients (1e-9)
optimizer.pyfind_formation() — semi-implicit projected GD on Σm\Sigma_m with BB step
diagnostics.pyDiagnosticVector — Bind / Sep / Inside / Persist
multi.pyK-field architecture (I9), inter-formation repulsion, coupled transport
transport.pytemporal transport kernel, Sinkhorn partial OT, persist_transport

The pipeline is canonical: graph → params → operators → energy → optimizer → diagnostics.

Experiments — exp1 through exp65

Fifty-seven experiments have run to completion, with exp65 flagged as a validation failure that drove the 2026-04-12 audit. Each experiment is registered under an E-xxxx ID in the experiment registry.

Twelve iterations of method

The path from brainstorming to the current spec can be read as twelve distinct iterations:

IterFocusKey output
I1Brainstorming (10 rounds)44 settled points
I2Deep mathematics12 theorems proved
I3Implementation designAlgorithm + module specs
I4ExtensionsGestalt mapping, 10 predictions
I5Vulnerability audit17 vulnerabilities found
I6Spec rewriteCanonical Spec v2.0
I7Temporal theoryT-Persist-1, Sep identity
I8Code + experimentsscc/ package, 89 tests
I9Multi-formationK-field architecture decided
I10PublicationTwo paper outlines + drafts
I11Transport implementationtransport.py, T-Persist verified
I12Multi-temporalT-Persist-K-Sep/Weak, regime classification

Repository structure (2026-04-20 reorganisation, current)

One-way promotion pipeline: working / topic.md leads through logs/weekly/draft_storming and weekly_summary into canonical/canonical.md. canonical/ accepts only promoted content; retractions remain explicit (inline erratum).

The 2026-04-12 "Research OS" reboot — an 8-layer structure with numbered 00_meta/07_archive/ directories and 5-role daily logs — was tried for four days, collapsed under its own scaffolding on 2026-04-16, and was archived on 2026-04-18. The current repository structure (2026-04-20) is a clean CODE/THEORY split:

  • CODE/ — executable assets: the scc/ package (12 modules), pytest suite (175 passing), experiments/ (exp1–exp97 plus W4-extended E-0090–E-0097), papers/, and scripts/.
  • THEORY/ — theory documents with strict three-way separation:
    • canonical/ (authoritative; canonical.md + theorem_status.md
      • open_problems.md); promoted content only.
    • working/ (in-progress development; one file per topic).
    • logs/ (chronological journal; daily/ + weekly/ + monthly/).
  • Promotion pipeline (2026-04-23 weekly rotation): working/<topic>.md → logs/weekly/YYYY-MM-W<n>/weekly_draft_storming.md → weekly_summary.md → canonical.md (one-way only, weekly merge cadence).

The Research OS approach is documented as an honest "tried and abandoned" record in _archive/research_os_2026-04-12/ — no silent reversion to it; current CLAUDE.md policy explicitly forbids re-introducing the numbered-directory / 5-role / per-item registry structure.

Papers on this track

Dedicated SCC manuscripts are in revision; when posted, they will appear in the papers index. In the meantime, the closest published-side work is the Axiomatic Framework for Understanding Relations via Gauge-Invariant Cohomology, which establishes the relational substrate underpinning SCC.